Time to update this three year old post, with data through August 2, 2009.
At which points in your team's history were they over and under .500? This stat refers to the number of games has won compared to the number they've lost (draws are considered half a win and half a loss percentage-wise in American sports, so they're disregarded). Over .500 is considered to be when the team has more wins than losses, and under .500 is the opposite. This takes into account all competitions, and all shootouts are counted as draws.
Also, the 2002 playoff series between the Burn and Rapids was a special case. The teams split the first two matches, and the third ended 1:1. The series OT was played, and Colorado scored to advance. The final score is listed as DAL 1:2 COL, however, the game is considered to be a draw. I agree with MLS on that point.
Series OT was played on two other occasions, but neither ended up with a messy statistical scenario like that. If you don't remember or weren't around for the whole "first to five" playoff format, consider yourself lucky.
The highs and lows refer to only the first time those marks were reached. Two teams are currently at their all time highs (CHI, CLB) while one is at their all time low (guess who).
CHICAGO
1998-03-24 | Over | 1998-04-11 | 0.500 | 1998-04-17 | Under | 1998-05-20 | 0.500 | 1998-05-23 | Over |
High | +71 | 2009-08-01 | Low | -2 | 1998-05-02 | Currently: +71
The Fire have been over .500 since the first two months of their inaugural season, and haven't looked back. The total of 71 games over .500 is tops in the league; they just passed the Galaxy this year.
CHIVAS USA
High | -1 | 2005-04-02 | Low | -21 | 2006-05-20 | Currently: -14
They've got a long way to go to climb out of the whole they dug themselves in 2005. The low was the 5-4 thriller they lost in New York, where Palencia and Razov each scored a brace.
COLORADO
1996-04-13 | Under | 1996-04-21 | 0.500 | 1996-05-05 | Over | 1996-05-08 | 0.500 | 1996-05-11 | Under | 1996-05-29 | 0.500 | 1996-06-08 | Under | 1996-07-04 | 0.500 | 1996-07-07 | Over | 1996-07-10 | 0.500 | 1996-07-17 | Under | 1999-07-28 | 0.500 | 1999-07-31 | Over | 1999-08-08 | 0.500 | 1999-08-13 | Over | 1999-08-18 | 0.500 | 1999-08-28 | Under | 1999-09-01 | 0.500 | 1999-09-04 | Under |
High | +1 | 1996-05-05 | Low | -34 | 2008-08-29 | Currently: -32
It's been a slow, steady pace downhill. They just have a couple more losses than wins every single year, it seems.
COLUMBUS
1996-04-13 | Over | 1996-04-20 | 0.500 | 1996-04-27 | Over | 1996-05-02 | 0.500 | 1996-05-11 | Over | 1996-05-15 | 0.500 | 1996-05-19 | Under | 1997-05-11 | 0.500 | 1997-05-22 | Under | 1998-04-18 | 0.500 | 1998-04-30 | Over | 1998-05-09 | 0.500 | 1998-05-17 | Under | 1998-05-22 | 0.500 | 1998-05-30 | Over | 1998-06-06 | 0.500 | 1998-06-20 | Over | 2007-06-03 | 0.500 | 2007-06-10 | Under | 2007-06-20 | 0.500 | 2007-06-23 | Over | 2007-09-08 | 0.500 | 2007-09-15 | Under | 2007-09-22 | 0.500 | 2007-09-30 | Under | 2007-10-20 | 0.500 | 2008-03-29 | Over | 2008-04-05 | 0.500 | 2008-04-12 | Over |
High | +18 | 2009-08-01 | Low | -7 | 1996-07-31 | Currently: +18
A new high this past weekend!
DALLAS
1996-04-14 | 0.500 | 1996-04-18 | Over | 1996-04-21 | 0.500 | 1996-04-28 | Over | 1996-05-01 | 0.500 | 1996-05-11 | Over | 1996-05-29 | 0.500 | 1996-06-02 | Under | 1996-06-08 | 0.500 | 1996-06-23 | Over | 1996-06-29 | 0.500 | 1996-07-07 | Under | 1996-07-20 | 0.500 | 1996-07-27 | Over | 1996-09-26 | 0.500 | 1996-09-29 | Over | 1996-10-27 | 0.500 | 1997-03-29 | Under | 1997-04-05 | 0.500 | 1997-04-13 | Under | 1997-05-23 | 0.500 | 1997-06-01 | Under | 1997-06-15 | 0.500 | 1997-06-28 | Under | 1997-07-13 | 0.500 | 1997-07-18 | Over | 1997-08-23 | 0.500 | 1997-08-31 | Over | 1998-03-04 | 0.500 | 1998-03-08 | Under | 1998-03-29 | 0.500 | 1998-04-11 | Under | 1998-05-06 | 0.500 | 1998-05-16 | Over | 1998-05-23 | 0.500 | 1998-05-31 | Over | 1998-06-04 | 0.500 | 1998-06-17 | Under | 1999-06-05 | 0.500 | 1999-06-12 | Under | 1999-06-16 | 0.500 | 1999-06-19 | Under | 1999-06-26 | 0.500 | 1999-07-04 | Under | 1999-07-10 | 0.500 | 1999-07-13 | Over | 1999-07-24 | 0.500 | 1999-07-31 | Under | 1999-08-04 | 0.500 | 1999-08-10 | Under | 1999-08-28 | 0.500 | 1999-09-04 | Under | 1999-09-11 | 0.500 | 1999-09-24 | Over | 2000-05-24 | 0.500 | 2000-05-27 | Under | 2000-06-14 | 0.500 | 2000-06-17 | Over | 2000-06-24 | 0.500 | 2000-06-28 | Under | 2000-07-01 | 0.500 | 2000-07-05 | Under | 2000-07-08 | 0.500 | 2000-07-15 | Over | 2001-04-07 | 0.500 | 2001-04-14 | Over | 2001-05-05 | 0.500 | 2001-05-12 | Over | 2001-05-23 | 0.500 | 2001-06-02 | Under | 2001-06-06 | 0.500 | 2001-06-09 | Over | 2001-06-27 | 0.500 | 2001-07-14 | Under | 2001-07-18 | 0.500 | 2001-07-21 | Under | 2002-06-15 | 0.500 | 2002-06-22 | Under | 2002-06-29 | 0.500 | 2002-07-04 | Over | 2002-09-14 | 0.500 | 2002-09-19 | Over | 2003-04-26 | 0.500 | 2003-05-10 | Under |
High | +4 | 1996-08-25 | Low | -16 | 2004-10-09 | Currently: -14
Far more changes than any other team. They danced around that .500 mark week in and week out until 2003.
D.C. UNITED
1996-04-06 | Under | 1996-07-12 | 0.500 | 1996-07-20 | Under | 1996-07-28 | 0.500 | 1996-07-31 | Under | 1996-08-21 | 0.500 | 1996-08-25 | Over |
High | +64 | 2007-09-29 | Low | -3 | 1996-04-20 | Currently: +61
Can they set a new high this season?
HOUSTON
2006-04-02 | Over | 2006-04-08 | 0.500 | 2006-04-15 | Under | 2006-04-22 | 0.500 | 2006-04-29 | Over |
High | +33 | 2009-07-07 | Low | -1 | 2006-04-15 | Currently: +31
They haven't been over .500 the entire time. There was that first month.
KANSAS CITY
1996-04-13 | Over | 1996-04-18 | 0.500 | 1996-05-02 | Over | 1996-05-05 | 0.500 | 1996-05-08 | Under | 1996-07-10 | 0.500 | 1996-07-18 | Under | 1996-07-31 | 0.500 | 1996-08-04 | Over | 1996-08-07 | 0.500 | 1996-08-15 | Over | 1996-08-24 | 0.500 | 1996-09-07 | Under | 1997-06-08 | 0.500 | 1997-06-15 | Under | 1997-06-21 | 0.500 | 1997-07-04 | Over | 1997-07-06 | 0.500 | 1997-07-12 | Under | 1997-07-19 | 0.500 | 1997-07-24 | Under | 1997-08-02 | 0.500 | 1997-08-09 | Over | 1997-10-04 | 0.500 | 1997-10-08 | Under | 1998-04-08 | 0.500 | 1998-04-18 | Under | 2005-08-13 | 0.500 | 2005-08-19 | Over | 2005-08-24 | 0.500 | 2005-08-26 | Under |
High | +2 | 1997-08-28 | Low | -20 | 1999-10-09 | Currently: -13
What's more likely? Breaking the high or the low?
LOS ANGELES
High | +77 | 2005-11-13 | Low | +1 | 1996-04-13 | Currently: +69
The only original MLS team never to have a losing record. The high point was after the 2005 MLS Cup, which is also the high water mark for any team in the league.
MIAMI
High | -1 | 1998-03-15 | Low | -19 | 2000-07-22 | Finished: -6
Under for every game starting with the first.
NEW ENGLAND
1996-04-13 | Under | 1996-04-20 | 0.500 | 1996-05-04 | Under | 2008-07-16 | 0.500 | 2008-07-30 | Over | 2008-08-09 | 0.500 | 2008-08-12 | Under |
High | +1 | 2008-07-30 | Low | -37 | 2002-08-18 | Currently: -7
It's been a slow climb back under Steve Nicol. After 12 years of being under .500, they finally got back to zero and then for a fleeting moment (the Superliga run) were over the hump. Now they'll have to work their way back up again. At least it shouldn't be as hard as the first time.
NEW YORK
High | -1 | 1996-04-13 | Low | -44 | 2009-07-25 | Currently: -44
Dedicated to badness. Currently at their all time low mark, which is saying something.
REAL SALT LAKE
2005-04-02 | 0.500 | 2005-04-09 | Under | 2005-04-16 | 0.500 | 2005-04-23 | Under | 2005-05-18 | 0.500 | 2005-05-21 | Under |
High | 0 | 2005-04-02 | Low | -34 | 2009-05-30 | Currently: -33
A long way to go.
SAN JOSE
1996-04-06 | Over | 1996-04-28 | 0.500 | 1996-05-04 | Over | 1996-05-18 | 0.500 | 1996-05-29 | Over | 1996-06-05 | 0.500 | 1996-06-08 | Under | 1996-06-16 | 0.500 | 1996-06-23 | Over | 1996-08-18 | 0.500 | 1996-08-25 | Over | 1996-10-02 | 0.500 | 1997-04-05 | Under | 1997-04-12 | 0.500 | 1997-05-03 | Under | 1997-05-09 | 0.500 | 1997-05-22 | Under | 2002-06-29 | 0.500 | 2002-07-04 | Under | 2002-07-07 | 0.500 | 2002-07-13 | Under | 2002-07-17 | 0.500 | 2002-07-20 | Over | 2002-08-07 | 0.500 | 2002-08-21 | Over | 2002-08-24 | 0.500 | 2002-08-31 | Under | 2002-09-07 | 0.500 | 2002-09-14 | Under | 2003-05-17 | 0.500 | 2003-05-31 | Under | 2003-06-21 | 0.500 | 2003-07-12 | Under | 2003-07-19 | 0.500 | 2003-07-26 | Over | 2003-08-05 | 0.500 | 2003-08-08 | Over |
High | +17 | 2005-10-15 | Low | -19 | 2001-04-21 | Currently: +3
It was an amazing turnaround for the Quakes. It took five years of battling to make it back up to .500, and another year to get over for good. The high point was the last game before the playoffs, where Dwayne De Rosario hit that amazing free kick. Unfortunately, the expansion team has dragged them back down again.
SEATTLE
High | +9 | 2009-07-21 | Low | +1 | 2009-03-19 | Currently: +8
With such a blazing start thanks to the Open Cup success, the Sounders could be looking at years before going negative.
TAMPA BAY
1996-04-13 | Over | 1998-05-23 | 0.500 | 1998-06-03 | Over | 1998-06-06 | 0.500 | 1998-06-21 | Over | 1998-07-04 | 0.500 | 1998-07-11 | Over | 1998-07-15 | 0.500 | 1998-07-18 | Over | 1998-07-22 | 0.500 | 1998-07-25 | Under | 1998-08-06 | 0.500 | 1998-08-22 | Under | 1998-09-03 | 0.500 | 1998-09-13 | Over | 1998-09-19 | 0.500 | 1998-09-24 | Over | 1999-04-03 | 0.500 | 1999-04-18 | Under | 1999-04-25 | 0.500 | 1999-05-01 | Over | 1999-05-29 | 0.500 | 1999-06-05 | Over | 1999-06-19 | 0.500 | 1999-06-27 | Under | 1999-07-08 | 0.500 | 1999-07-12 | Over | 1999-07-22 | 0.500 | 1999-07-31 | Over | 1999-08-13 | 0.500 | 1999-08-18 | Over | 1999-10-17 | 0.500 | 1999-10-22 | Under | 2000-03-18 | 0.500 | 2000-03-25 | Over | 2000-04-01 | 0.500 | 2000-04-08 | Under | 2000-04-15 | 0.500 | 2000-04-22 | Under | 2000-04-26 | 0.500 | 2000-04-28 | Under | 2000-05-06 | 0.500 | 2000-05-13 | Over | 2000-05-20 | 0.500 | 2000-05-24 | Under | 2000-06-03 | 0.500 | 2000-06-09 | Over | 2000-06-21 | 0.500 | 2000-06-24 | Over | 2001-05-05 | 0.500 | 2001-05-12 | Under |
High | +11 | 1997-04-12 | Low | -17 | 2001-09-09 | Finished: -17
They started out great in 1996, hovered around the zero mark for years, and finally ended on a huge low with the worst team in MLS history in 2001.
TORONTO
High | -1 | 2007-04-07 | Low | -16 | 2008-09-20 | Currently: -14
Starting with the very first game, TFC has been under .500 for their entire existence so far.Labels: .500 mark |
Comments on "MLS: The .500 Mark"
I would love to see this updated... perhaps after the end of the 2007 season?
This is a great stat to keep. Thanks.