How old was each MLS team this year? I've got the answers below. I've also updated many of the all time age stats for each team and the league. This is a lot of data, so if you have any interesting observations or questions I would love to hear them.
But first, a word of explanation on how this was figured out. I've given each player an age for the season, taken at the midway point (July 1st). So for example, Landon Donovan was 28.236 years old for 2010. Then, in order to take into account playing time, I multiplied by the number of minutes played. I then added the totals for each team, which were then divided by the entire team's number of minutes played.
Here are the results for 2010:
|
| Age | Table | 1 | Houston | 28.47 | 12 | 2 | Seattle | 28.10 | 6 | 3 | New York | 28.08 | 3 | 4 | Real Salt Lake | 27.90 | 2 | 5 | Dallas | 27.78 | 4 | 6 | San Jose | 27.69 | 8 | 7 | Kansas City | 27.59 | 9 | 8 | Colorado | 27.54 | 7 | 9 | Columbus | 27.43 | 5 | 10 | Chivas USA | 27.15 | 15 | 11 | Chicago | 27.09 | 10 | 12 | Los Angeles | 27.05 | 1 | 13 | Philadelphia | 26.59 | 14 | 14 | Toronto | 26.52 | 11 | 15 | New England | 26.48 | 13 | 16 | DC United | 26.22 | 16 | Houston was by far the oldest team in 2010. It's not unusual for them, however. They've been ranked 2-1-1-4-1 in their five years of existence.
Most of the teams who did well this season were older, with the exception of LA. This isn't a trend which has been seen in years past, though. CLB was the second youngest team in both 2008-09, when they won the Supporters Shield twice. That's just one of many examples. When I checked after the 2008 season, there was only a 0.11 correlation between age and PPG (compared to 0.55 from a Basketball Prospectus article on the NBA's ages).
It's interesting to see LA among the younger teams this year. Last year, they had the 4th oldest team in league history.
Team Average Ages Chart
| 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CHI | xxx | xxx | 28.24 | 29.25 | 26.76 | 26.70 | 26.70 | 25.49 | 25.44 | 26.54 | 27.22 | 27.37 | 28.26 | 27.94 | 27.09 | CHV | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 26.58 | 26.94 | 26.96 | 26.88 | 28.22 | 27.15 | CLB | 27.28 | 27.49 | 27.88 | 28.06 | 28.81 | 28.08 | 26.59 | 26.90 | 27.03 | 27.15 | 25.63 | 27.10 | 26.78 | 26.62 | 27.43 | COL | 28.39 | 27.51 | 27.57 | 28.55 | 27.45 | 28.51 | 29.56 | 27.73 | 27.29 | 26.86 | 27.49 | 27.60 | 27.12 | 27.45 | 27.54 | DAL | 28.39 | 27.59 | 28.45 | 28.32 | 28.41 | 28.25 | 27.54 | 26.21 | 26.86 | 26.65 | 27.18 | 25.43 | 26.28 | 27.20 | 27.78 | DC | 26.33 | 27.22 | 26.90 | 27.32 | 27.01 | 25.99 | 26.33 | 26.35 | 25.95 | 25.73 | 25.49 | 27.16 | 27.85 | 27.22 | 26.22 | HOU | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 28.07 | 28.49 | 28.79 | 28.13 | 28.47 | KC | 27.57 | 28.50 | 28.90 | 28.29 | 28.30 | 27.65 | 28.55 | 28.55 | 27.21 | 27.91 | 27.16 | 27.07 | 27.66 | 28.58 | 27.59 | LA | 26.47 | 26.96 | 26.85 | 27.97 | 28.08 | 27.84 | 27.19 | 28.11 | 27.43 | 26.65 | 26.16 | 27.77 | 27.98 | 29.04 | 27.05 | MIA | xxx | xxx | 27.77 | 25.97 | 26.91 | 29.48 | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | NE | 26.70 | 27.72 | 27.84 | 28.73 | 27.31 | 27.18 | 27.06 | 27.14 | 26.65 | 26.28 | 27.04 | 27.40 | 27.14 | 26.49 | 26.48 | NY | 27.44 | 27.44 | 27.41 | 26.50 | 27.90 | 27.37 | 26.08 | 25.80 | 24.71 | 26.50 | 27.52 | 27.70 | 27.22 | 27.29 | 28.08 | PHI | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 26.59 | RSL | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 26.94 | 28.09 | 26.78 | 26.87 | 26.80 | 27.90 | SEA | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 27.39 | 28.10 | SJ | 27.54 | 28.08 | 27.20 | 25.80 | 27.25 | 26.70 | 27.08 | 27.37 | 28.22 | 27.92 | xxx | xxx | 28.19 | 28.10 | 27.69 | TB | 28.84 | 28.52 | 28.31 | 27.49 | 28.97 | 27.90 | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | TOR | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 26.57 | 28.13 | 27.10 | 26.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TOTAL | 27.50 | 27.70 | 27.78 | 27.69 | 27.76 | 27.64 | 27.27 | 26.97 | 26.68 | 26.81 | 27.00 | 27.18 | 27.51 | 27.57 | 27.36 |
Team Yearly Age Ranks Chart
(How teams ranked each year in terms of age. Ranked from oldest to youngest, so a one means they were the oldest team that season)
| 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CHI | xxx | xxx | 4 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 11 | CHV | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 8 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 3 | 10 | CLB | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 13 | 14 | 9 | COL | 2 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 8 | DAL | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 14 | 11 | 5 | DC | 10 | 9 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 16 | HOU | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | KC | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 | LA | 9 | 10 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 12 | MIA | xxx | xxx | 7 | 11 | 11 | 1 | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | NE | 8 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 15 | 15 | NY | 6 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 3 | PHI | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 13 | RSL | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 4 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 4 | SEA | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 8 | 2 | SJ | 5 | 3 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | xxx | xxx | 3 | 5 | 6 | TB | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 5 | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | TOR | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | xxx | 12 | 4 | 12 | 14 |
MLS Leaguewide Average Age
The average age for all of MLS this season was 27.36, which was down from 27.57 in 2009. This comes after five straight years of increases. All time, the average age is 27.37 years.
No team this season came close to making the list of youngest or oldest teams:
Top Ten Youngest MLS Teams
1 | 2004 | New York | 24.71 | 2 | 2007 | Dallas | 25.43 | 3 | 2004 | Chicago | 25.44 | 4 | 2003 | Chicago | 25.49 | 5 | 2006 | DC United | 25.49 | 6 | 2006 | Columbus | 25.63 | 7 | 2005 | DC United | 25.72 | 8 | 2003 | New York | 25.80 | 9 | 1999 | San Jose | 25.80 | 10 | 2004 | DC United | 25.95 |
Top Ten Oldest MLS Teams
1 | 2002 | Colorado | 29.56 | 2 | 2001 | Miami | 29.48 | 3 | 1999 | Chicago | 29.25 | 4 | 2009 | Los Angeles | 29.04 | 5 | 2000 | Tampa Bay | 28.97 | 6 | 1998 | Kansas City | 28.90 | 7 | 1996 | Tampa Bay | 28.84 | 8 | 2000 | Columbus | 28.81 | 9 | 2008 | Houston | 28.79 | 10 | 1999 | New England | 28.73 |
MLS History: Percentage of Minutes Played by Age
How about a breakdown for 2010's teams?
2010 Minutes by Age Group
|
| 15-19 | 20-24 | 25-29 | 30-34 | 35-39 | 40-42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CHI |
| 0.00% | 47.66% | 29.57% | 9.44% | 13.33% | 0.00% | CHV |
| 0.02% | 44.93% | 33.68% | 14.59% | 6.78% | 0.00% | CLB |
| 0.00% | 37.06% | 44.31% | 4.20% | 14.43% | 0.00% | COL |
| 0.00% | 17.21% | 68.38% | 13.74% | 0.67% | 0.00% | DAL |
| 0.21% | 34.02% | 24.52% | 32.14% | 9.11% | 0.00% | DC |
| 9.28% | 27.88% | 44.93% | 12.49% | 5.42% | 0.00% | HOU |
| 0.00% | 30.66% | 37.94% | 24.38% | 0.00% | 7.02% | KC |
| 0.00% | 39.00% | 29.49% | 31.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | LA |
| 2.96% | 33.18% | 40.77% | 15.96% | 7.12% | 0.00% | NE |
| 0.00% | 48.40% | 26.19% | 17.47% | 7.94% | 0.00% | NY |
| 0.05% | 25.12% | 46.16% | 28.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | PHI |
| 10.89% | 28.72% | 24.98% | 33.26% | 2.14% | 0.00% | RSL |
| 0.00% | 22.43% | 49.39% | 28.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | SEA |
| 0.54% | 34.25% | 42.35% | 5.98% | 7.92% | 8.95% | SJ |
| 0.26% | 23.63% | 51.15% | 18.94% | 6.02% | 0.00% | TOR |
| 4.74% | 30.10% | 45.22% | 19.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | Philadelphia had 10.89% of their minutes played by teens. This is the 4th highest percentage in league history.
It's also notable that Dallas and Philly both had low percentages of minutes played by players in their 20's. They were at 58.84% and 53.70% respectively. Every other team in 2010 was at 68% or higher, and only 20/180 MLS seasons have been under 60%.
All Time Minutes by Age Group
|
|
| 15-19 | 20-24 | 25-29 | 30-34 | 35-39 | 40-42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MLS | 1996 |
| 0.24% | 24.99% | 52.17% | 21.41% | 1.20% | 0.00% | MLS | 1997 |
| 0.07% | 27.33% | 46.77% | 23.75% | 2.08% | 0.00% | MLS | 1998 |
| 0.05% | 29.20% | 41.84% | 25.50% | 3.40% | 0.00% | MLS | 1999 |
| 0.18% | 30.38% | 38.07% | 25.34% | 6.03% | 0.00% | MLS | 2000 |
| 0.79% | 32.22% | 36.30% | 24.69% | 6.00% | 0.00% | MLS | 2001 |
| 3.03% | 29.11% | 34.89% | 27.50% | 5.46% | 0.00% | MLS | 2002 |
| 2.40% | 29.06% | 43.12% | 20.55% | 3.99% | 0.88% | MLS | 2003 |
| 2.53% | 29.33% | 45.12% | 18.99% | 3.16% | 0.87% | MLS | 2004 |
| 3.76% | 32.81% | 43.32% | 15.05% | 5.03% | 0.03% | MLS | 2005 |
| 3.03% | 38.09% | 35.42% | 18.22% | 5.11% | 0.13% | MLS | 2006 |
| 2.39% | 39.81% | 31.44% | 22.47% | 3.89% | 0.00% | MLS | 2007 |
| 1.55% | 33.92% | 34.32% | 27.42% | 2.79% | 0.00% | MLS | 2008 |
| 1.24% | 32.81% | 33.32% | 29.16% | 2.96% | 0.51% | MLS | 2009 |
| 0.50% | 35.62% | 32.66% | 24.94% | 5.65% | 0.63% | MLS | 2010 |
| 1.80% | 32.76% | 39.95% | 19.42% | 5.06% | 1.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MLS | Total |
| 1.51% | 32.13% | 38.74% | 23.15% | 4.19% | 0.28% |
|
|
| 15-19 | 20-24 | 25-29 | 30-34 | 35-39 | 40-42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CHI | 1998 |
| 0.00% | 39.70% | 16.83% | 43.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | CHI | 1999 |
| 0.00% | 16.28% | 40.47% | 28.47% | 14.78% | 0.00% | CHI | 2000 |
| 3.36% | 28.04% | 50.71% | 7.43% | 10.46% | 0.00% | CHI | 2001 |
| 7.89% | 30.36% | 46.89% | 5.79% | 9.07% | 0.00% | CHI | 2002 |
| 0.33% | 42.35% | 44.75% | 0.70% | 11.88% | 0.00% | CHI | 2003 |
| 4.92% | 41.54% | 46.13% | 7.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | CHI | 2004 |
| 6.99% | 37.06% | 44.12% | 11.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | CHI | 2005 |
| 0.51% | 46.30% | 18.39% | 34.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | CHI | 2006 |
| 0.00% | 53.17% | 14.70% | 28.04% | 4.10% | 0.00% | CHI | 2007 |
| 0.00% | 44.12% | 24.62% | 31.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | CHI | 2008 |
| 0.00% | 27.18% | 34.75% | 21.25% | 16.82% | 0.00% | CHI | 2009 |
| 0.00% | 36.83% | 32.80% | 18.83% | 11.55% | 0.00% | CHI | 2010 |
| 0.00% | 47.66% | 29.57% | 9.44% | 13.33% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CHV | 2005 |
| 0.02% | 47.06% | 32.37% | 12.41% | 8.15% | 0.00% | CHV | 2006 |
| 0.07% | 50.45% | 13.41% | 27.54% | 8.53% | 0.00% | CHV | 2007 |
| 0.05% | 52.16% | 17.75% | 22.75% | 7.28% | 0.00% | CHV | 2008 |
| 2.00% | 48.13% | 24.41% | 21.81% | 3.65% | 0.00% | CHV | 2009 |
| 1.12% | 35.05% | 25.49% | 23.62% | 14.35% | 0.38% | CHV | 2010 |
| 0.02% | 44.93% | 33.68% | 14.59% | 6.78% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CLB | 1996 |
| 0.00% | 38.79% | 31.67% | 29.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | CLB | 1997 |
| 0.00% | 41.90% | 28.92% | 25.04% | 4.14% | 0.00% | CLB | 1998 |
| 0.00% | 21.74% | 48.77% | 23.13% | 6.36% | 0.00% | CLB | 1999 |
| 0.00% | 20.98% | 47.85% | 19.26% | 11.91% | 0.00% | CLB | 2000 |
| 0.00% | 17.66% | 48.20% | 25.93% | 8.20% | 0.00% | CLB | 2001 |
| 0.00% | 28.60% | 39.97% | 28.73% | 2.70% | 0.00% | CLB | 2002 |
| 0.00% | 38.71% | 43.82% | 13.16% | 4.32% | 0.00% | CLB | 2003 |
| 0.00% | 15.33% | 60.99% | 23.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | CLB | 2004 |
| 9.51% | 26.89% | 41.36% | 13.75% | 8.50% | 0.00% | CLB | 2005 |
| 3.53% | 49.47% | 12.92% | 25.84% | 8.24% | 0.00% | CLB | 2006 |
| 10.78% | 34.54% | 39.86% | 14.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | CLB | 2007 |
| 0.00% | 39.07% | 36.42% | 18.25% | 6.26% | 0.00% | CLB | 2008 |
| 0.00% | 39.68% | 36.93% | 13.56% | 9.83% | 0.00% | CLB | 2009 |
| 0.00% | 50.07% | 30.94% | 12.85% | 6.15% | 0.00% | CLB | 2010 |
| 0.00% | 37.06% | 44.31% | 4.20% | 14.43% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| COL | 1996 |
| 0.00% | 25.69% | 42.10% | 25.67% | 6.55% | 0.00% | COL | 1997 |
| 0.00% | 22.03% | 59.31% | 18.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | COL | 1998 |
| 0.00% | 25.05% | 47.14% | 27.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | COL | 1999 |
| 0.00% | 28.07% | 22.71% | 49.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | COL | 2000 |
| 0.06% | 44.95% | 20.90% | 34.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | COL | 2001 |
| 0.74% | 24.73% | 30.96% | 39.32% | 4.25% | 0.00% | COL | 2002 |
| 0.00% | 25.67% | 22.91% | 33.89% | 8.72% | 8.81% | COL | 2003 |
| 0.00% | 36.36% | 23.81% | 32.14% | 7.69% | 0.00% | COL | 2004 |
| 0.00% | 40.44% | 35.18% | 24.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | COL | 2005 |
| 0.40% | 37.15% | 49.68% | 11.38% | 1.38% | 0.00% | COL | 2006 |
| 0.00% | 33.01% | 38.60% | 28.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | COL | 2007 |
| 0.00% | 28.54% | 30.51% | 39.17% | 1.78% | 0.00% | COL | 2008 |
| 0.00% | 30.25% | 45.68% | 20.12% | 3.95% | 0.00% | COL | 2009 |
| 0.00% | 13.14% | 71.84% | 11.69% | 3.34% | 0.00% | COL | 2010 |
| 0.00% | 17.21% | 68.38% | 13.74% | 0.67% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DAL | 1996 |
| 0.92% | 15.30% | 50.57% | 27.80% | 5.40% | 0.00% | DAL | 1997 |
| 0.00% | 26.27% | 47.26% | 26.25% | 0.22% | 0.00% | DAL | 1998 |
| 0.00% | 17.03% | 52.27% | 26.20% | 4.50% | 0.00% | DAL | 1999 |
| 0.00% | 19.48% | 50.64% | 28.19% | 1.68% | 0.00% | DAL | 2000 |
| 0.00% | 30.97% | 36.63% | 32.34% | 0.07% | 0.00% | DAL | 2001 |
| 6.51% | 12.74% | 28.16% | 48.83% | 3.77% | 0.00% | DAL | 2002 |
| 8.45% | 17.16% | 43.61% | 30.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DAL | 2003 |
| 7.69% | 39.81% | 24.12% | 28.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DAL | 2004 |
| 0.36% | 34.81% | 35.65% | 25.47% | 3.71% | 0.00% | DAL | 2005 |
| 3.61% | 34.50% | 35.92% | 23.92% | 2.04% | 0.00% | DAL | 2006 |
| 0.04% | 36.42% | 30.03% | 32.37% | 1.14% | 0.00% | DAL | 2007 |
| 1.48% | 45.21% | 37.70% | 13.78% | 1.82% | 0.00% | DAL | 2008 |
| 1.40% | 51.37% | 18.67% | 28.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DAL | 2009 |
| 2.46% | 41.85% | 21.53% | 34.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DAL | 2010 |
| 0.21% | 34.02% | 24.52% | 32.14% | 9.11% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DC | 1996 |
| 0.00% | 26.62% | 68.53% | 4.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DC | 1997 |
| 0.00% | 20.62% | 62.23% | 17.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DC | 1998 |
| 0.00% | 31.59% | 48.04% | 20.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DC | 1999 |
| 0.00% | 26.81% | 40.82% | 32.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DC | 2000 |
| 5.61% | 27.89% | 29.33% | 37.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DC | 2001 |
| 7.46% | 47.01% | 18.00% | 25.11% | 2.42% | 0.00% | DC | 2002 |
| 13.93% | 24.40% | 37.11% | 24.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DC | 2003 |
| 2.38% | 33.00% | 49.01% | 12.69% | 2.91% | 0.00% | DC | 2004 |
| 5.24% | 30.80% | 46.55% | 10.35% | 7.06% | 0.00% | DC | 2005 |
| 4.70% | 40.49% | 38.52% | 15.38% | 0.90% | 0.00% | DC | 2006 |
| 7.98% | 55.29% | 20.70% | 16.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DC | 2007 |
| 0.35% | 30.25% | 46.30% | 23.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DC | 2008 |
| 0.00% | 30.68% | 44.43% | 24.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | DC | 2009 |
| 0.00% | 39.32% | 28.62% | 27.88% | 4.18% | 0.00% | DC | 2010 |
| 9.28% | 27.88% | 44.93% | 12.49% | 5.42% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HOU | 2006 |
| 0.00% | 26.67% | 45.73% | 18.46% | 9.15% | 0.00% | HOU | 2007 |
| 0.00% | 22.95% | 45.67% | 23.23% | 8.15% | 0.00% | HOU | 2008 |
| 0.00% | 19.71% | 25.39% | 47.82% | 0.00% | 7.09% | HOU | 2009 |
| 0.36% | 38.06% | 29.74% | 22.70% | 0.00% | 9.14% | HOU | 2010 |
| 0.00% | 30.66% | 37.94% | 24.38% | 0.00% | 7.02% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| KC | 1996 |
| 0.00% | 23.47% | 51.86% | 24.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | KC | 1997 |
| 0.40% | 19.91% | 52.95% | 22.13% | 4.60% | 0.00% | KC | 1998 |
| 0.10% | 15.47% | 51.71% | 19.29% | 13.44% | 0.00% | KC | 1999 |
| 0.00% | 30.55% | 31.53% | 21.75% | 16.16% | 0.00% | KC | 2000 |
| 0.00% | 34.21% | 27.61% | 24.23% | 13.96% | 0.00% | KC | 2001 |
| 0.34% | 28.36% | 42.28% | 25.83% | 3.19% | 0.00% | KC | 2002 |
| 0.00% | 17.28% | 54.87% | 16.23% | 11.62% | 0.00% | KC | 2003 |
| 0.00% | 18.65% | 53.78% | 18.86% | 0.00% | 8.71% | KC | 2004 |
| 0.00% | 33.57% | 46.83% | 12.92% | 6.37% | 0.30% | KC | 2005 |
| 0.00% | 25.79% | 50.23% | 22.47% | 0.00% | 1.51% | KC | 2006 |
| 0.70% | 24.69% | 56.68% | 17.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | KC | 2007 |
| 2.25% | 25.24% | 47.42% | 25.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | KC | 2008 |
| 0.00% | 35.83% | 27.55% | 36.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | KC | 2009 |
| 0.00% | 31.25% | 28.87% | 30.78% | 9.11% | 0.00% | KC | 2010 |
| 0.00% | 39.00% | 29.49% | 31.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LA | 1996 |
| 0.00% | 33.66% | 66.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | LA | 1997 |
| 0.00% | 38.13% | 45.66% | 16.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | LA | 1998 |
| 0.00% | 41.96% | 24.22% | 33.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | LA | 1999 |
| 0.53% | 21.07% | 40.57% | 30.64% | 7.19% | 0.00% | LA | 2000 |
| 0.00% | 21.20% | 40.14% | 31.91% | 6.75% | 0.00% | LA | 2001 |
| 0.00% | 30.94% | 37.05% | 25.03% | 6.99% | 0.00% | LA | 2002 |
| 0.00% | 41.56% | 30.37% | 28.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | LA | 2003 |
| 0.42% | 31.82% | 37.69% | 25.72% | 4.35% | 0.00% | LA | 2004 |
| 0.38% | 32.26% | 42.72% | 14.85% | 9.79% | 0.00% | LA | 2005 |
| 0.00% | 45.36% | 31.61% | 15.44% | 7.59% | 0.00% | LA | 2006 |
| 7.07% | 48.79% | 20.82% | 17.92% | 5.40% | 0.00% | LA | 2007 |
| 4.10% | 26.74% | 33.24% | 30.25% | 5.68% | 0.00% | LA | 2008 |
| 0.02% | 32.58% | 28.42% | 36.09% | 2.88% | 0.00% | LA | 2009 |
| 0.00% | 25.95% | 28.94% | 28.74% | 16.37% | 0.00% | LA | 2010 |
| 2.96% | 33.18% | 40.77% | 15.96% | 7.12% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MIA | 1998 |
| 0.00% | 38.41% | 30.99% | 25.69% | 4.92% | 0.00% | MIA | 1999 |
| 0.00% | 54.93% | 22.86% | 17.10% | 5.11% | 0.00% | MIA | 2000 |
| 0.34% | 37.61% | 34.61% | 23.74% | 3.70% | 0.00% | MIA | 2001 |
| 0.05% | 28.11% | 18.63% | 36.95% | 16.25% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NE | 1996 |
| 0.00% | 32.80% | 52.42% | 14.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NE | 1997 |
| 0.00% | 25.22% | 50.60% | 17.93% | 6.25% | 0.00% | NE | 1998 |
| 0.16% | 20.34% | 57.18% | 22.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NE | 1999 |
| 1.59% | 17.88% | 42.41% | 30.26% | 7.85% | 0.00% | NE | 2000 |
| 0.10% | 35.26% | 35.98% | 28.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NE | 2001 |
| 0.00% | 41.01% | 34.22% | 18.01% | 6.77% | 0.00% | NE | 2002 |
| 0.00% | 29.87% | 47.06% | 23.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NE | 2003 |
| 0.00% | 24.13% | 57.30% | 18.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NE | 2004 |
| 0.00% | 40.65% | 43.21% | 16.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NE | 2005 |
| 0.00% | 42.52% | 39.02% | 18.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NE | 2006 |
| 0.00% | 40.53% | 34.27% | 25.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NE | 2007 |
| 0.07% | 32.54% | 36.62% | 30.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NE | 2008 |
| 8.97% | 31.30% | 28.20% | 31.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NE | 2009 |
| 0.13% | 42.85% | 27.05% | 24.75% | 5.22% | 0.00% | NE | 2010 |
| 0.00% | 48.40% | 26.19% | 17.47% | 7.94% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NY | 1996 |
| 0.00% | 18.14% | 63.59% | 18.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NY | 1997 |
| 0.00% | 29.55% | 46.18% | 24.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NY | 1998 |
| 0.29% | 23.01% | 66.05% | 10.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NY | 1999 |
| 0.00% | 38.73% | 39.98% | 21.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NY | 2000 |
| 0.00% | 51.68% | 13.37% | 26.69% | 8.26% | 0.00% | NY | 2001 |
| 0.00% | 33.30% | 31.55% | 35.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NY | 2002 |
| 0.00% | 36.59% | 50.57% | 9.51% | 3.34% | 0.00% | NY | 2003 |
| 7.78% | 30.08% | 51.78% | 10.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NY | 2004 |
| 13.86% | 34.79% | 41.91% | 9.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NY | 2005 |
| 20.77% | 29.21% | 23.05% | 9.59% | 17.37% | 0.00% | NY | 2006 |
| 1.11% | 38.58% | 31.18% | 10.74% | 18.38% | 0.00% | NY | 2007 |
| 4.73% | 21.65% | 33.84% | 34.51% | 5.27% | 0.00% | NY | 2008 |
| 2.24% | 33.40% | 32.98% | 31.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NY | 2009 |
| 0.00% | 32.63% | 40.48% | 26.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | NY | 2010 |
| 0.05% | 25.12% | 46.16% | 28.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PHI | 2010 |
| 10.89% | 28.72% | 24.98% | 33.26% | 2.14% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RSL | 2005 |
| 2.81% | 32.59% | 44.85% | 19.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | RSL | 2006 |
| 0.92% | 35.52% | 31.40% | 32.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | RSL | 2007 |
| 5.70% | 35.68% | 27.74% | 30.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | RSL | 2008 |
| 0.00% | 19.42% | 66.53% | 14.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | RSL | 2009 |
| 0.00% | 34.15% | 48.30% | 17.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | RSL | 2010 |
| 0.00% | 22.43% | 49.39% | 28.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SEA | 2009 |
| 0.00% | 37.31% | 37.94% | 16.10% | 8.65% | 0.00% | SEA | 2010 |
| 0.54% | 34.25% | 42.35% | 5.98% | 7.92% | 8.95% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SJ | 1996 |
| 1.46% | 12.08% | 62.74% | 23.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | SJ | 1997 |
| 0.00% | 19.47% | 43.36% | 37.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | SJ | 1998 |
| 0.00% | 47.72% | 21.39% | 25.79% | 5.09% | 0.00% | SJ | 1999 |
| 0.00% | 55.87% | 32.22% | 11.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | SJ | 2000 |
| 0.00% | 36.24% | 47.45% | 16.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | SJ | 2001 |
| 6.33% | 23.50% | 46.19% | 23.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | SJ | 2002 |
| 1.15% | 17.23% | 56.17% | 25.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | SJ | 2003 |
| 2.14% | 22.91% | 45.88% | 12.38% | 16.68% | 0.00% | SJ | 2004 |
| 1.26% | 16.78% | 55.68% | 11.43% | 14.86% | 0.00% | SJ | 2005 |
| 0.00% | 26.63% | 48.64% | 9.07% | 15.66% | 0.00% | SJ | 2008 |
| 0.00% | 29.54% | 35.49% | 30.98% | 3.99% | 0.00% | SJ | 2009 |
| 0.00% | 29.97% | 30.33% | 33.90% | 5.80% | 0.00% | SJ | 2010 |
| 0.26% | 23.63% | 51.15% | 18.94% | 6.02% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TB | 1996 |
| 0.00% | 23.37% | 31.89% | 44.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | TB | 1997 |
| 0.34% | 30.26% | 31.12% | 32.74% | 5.53% | 0.00% | TB | 1998 |
| 0.00% | 28.42% | 37.65% | 27.43% | 6.51% | 0.00% | TB | 1999 |
| 0.00% | 34.06% | 44.78% | 13.52% | 7.63% | 0.00% | TB | 2000 |
| 0.00% | 20.99% | 50.50% | 7.79% | 20.72% | 0.00% | TB | 2001 |
| 6.93% | 20.79% | 43.78% | 18.60% | 9.90% | 0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TOR | 2007 |
| 1.43% | 36.85% | 28.18% | 33.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | TOR | 2008 |
| 2.85% | 30.34% | 16.87% | 49.63% | 0.30% | 0.00% | TOR | 2009 |
| 3.39% | 45.95% | 7.02% | 43.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | TOR | 2010 |
| 4.74% | 30.10% | 45.22% | 19.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | Labels: player ages, team ages |
Comments on "MLS Team Ages 2010"
is there a way we could get the figures for 2011?