On the 2006 Champion Dynamo...
They will go down as having the 9th best regular season record among the 11 MLS Cup champions. The best champ was the 1999 DC United team, while the last three winners are the worst three teams. I should point out that despite their low seed, the 2005 Galaxy were actually a better team than the 2004 DC United team. They had a PPG of 1.41 vs 1.40 for DC. Although that may have been inflated by the expansion teams, it still goes down in the record books as better.
The average PPG over all the history of MLS is about 1.39. KC ranks above Chicago by virtue of a better goal differential. New England may have deserved a title more due to their past anguish, but Houston's win was the better result for the league as a whole. Back in April I listed my rankings on which teams most needed to be successful in 2006. Dynamo were 3rd and the Revs were 9th. Nothing like starting a franchise with a great season to create some long time fans, and it should help them in their stadium search as well. The Dynamo had four foreigners in their MLS Cup starting lineup, versus three by the Revolution (Dorman, John, and Joseph). That seems like a lot, but it's not a record. The 2002 Los Angeles Galaxy used a lineup where domestic players were a minority, the only champions to do so. I'm counting a player's nationality as the country he plays for in international soccer.
|
Comments on "On the 2006 Champion Dynamo..."
DeRosario played for San Jose, too, didn't he?
DeRosario played in both SJ titles if I'm not mistaken, and scored in at least one of them, but wasn't part of the starting lineup which I think is what is being compared here.
Re: the 2002 Galaxy:
Only two of those six players didn't play NCAA soccer either...
Yes, it's the starting lineups only.
2007 Champions Dynamo is good for 6th-place, with a PPG of 1.733, slightly better than 2001 SJ's 1.731...