I've already examined the NFL and NHL, so now it's time for professional basketball.
What if the NBA had implemented a system of promotion and relegation? There was no obvious point to start like with the NFL and NHL, so I settled on the 1967-68 season. That's when the league was expanded to 12 team, the same starting number I used for the NHL, and it also means that all three of these posts started right around the same time.
Like the other posts, I used the same number of playoff teams that would be used for one conference in real life. I also used the same number of promoted and relegated teams (three each).
NBA FINALS CHANGES
Due to the yearly dominance of the top seeds in the NBA, I wasn't expecting many changes. But there turned out to be five different champions, one more than the NHL. Losing their titles were 1969 Boston, 1975 Golden State, 1977 Portland, 1995 Houston, and 2008 Boston. They are replaced by Los Angeles, Washington, Philadelphia, Orlando, and Los Angeles. So the Celtics lose twwo titles, while the Lakers gain two. That would shift the current balance from 17-16 in Boston's favor to 18-15, LA.
Here's the full list of different finalists. Champions are listed as the first team. With pro/rel is on the left, and real life is on the right:
1968 | Boston | vs | Philadelphia |
| Boston | vs | Los Angeles | 1969 | Los Angeles | vs | New York |
| Boston | vs | Los Angeles | 1971 | Milwaukee | vs | New York |
| Milwaukee | vs | Baltimore | 1972 | Los Angeles | vs | Milwaukee |
| Los Angeles | vs | New York | 1975 | Washington | vs | Boston |
| Golden State | vs | Washington | 1976 | Boston | vs | Golden State |
| Boston | vs | Phoenix | 1977 | Philadelphia | vs | Houston |
| Portland | vs | Philadelphia | 1981 | Boston | vs | Philadelphia |
| Boston | vs | Houston | 1995 | Orlando | vs | San Antonio |
| Houston | vs | Orlando | 2002 | Los Angeles | vs | Sacramento |
| Los Angeles | vs | New Jersey | 2008 | Los Angeles | vs | Detroit |
| Boston | vs | Los Angeles | 2010 | Los Angeles | vs | Orlando |
| Los Angeles | vs | Boston | Why did each finalist miss out?
In second division:
1968 Los Angeles 1975 Golden State 1976 Phoenix 1977 Portland 2002 New Jersey 2008 Boston
Didn't qualify for playoffs:
1969 Boston (relegated) 1971 Baltimore 1972 New York 1981 Houston 1995 Houston 2010 Boston
YEARS IN EACH DIVISON
(including 2011-12)
|
| PCT | 1st | 2nd | Playoffs | 1 | Los Angeles Lakers | 86.67% | 39 | 6 | 32 | 2 | San Antonio Spurs | 77.78% | 28 | 8 | 21 | 3 | Utah Jazz | 71.05% | 27 | 11 | 18 | 4 | Phoenix Suns | 70.45% | 31 | 13 | 17 | 5 | Portland Trailblazers | 69.05% | 29 | 13 | 13 | 6 | Boston Celtics | 62.22% | 28 | 17 | 20 | 6 | Houston Rockets | 62.22% | 28 | 17 | 12 | 8 | New York Knicks | 55.56% | 25 | 20 | 13 | 9 | Miami Heat | 54.17% | 13 | 11 | 8 | 9 | New Orleans Hornets | 54.17% | 13 | 11 | 2 | 11 | Detroit Pistons | 53.33% | 24 | 21 | 15 | 11 | Oklahoma City Thunder | 53.33% | 24 | 21 | 13 | 13 | Dallas Mavericks | 53.13% | 17 | 15 | 14 | 14 | Denver Nuggets | 52.78% | 19 | 17 | 9 | 15 | Milwaukee Bucks | 52.27% | 23 | 21 | 12 | 16 | Chicago Bulls | 51.11% | 23 | 22 | 16 | 16 | Philadelphia 76ers | 51.11% | 23 | 22 | 15 | 18 | Atlanta Hawks | 48.89% | 22 | 23 | 10 | 19 | Orlando Magic | 47.83% | 11 | 12 | 5 | 20 | Sacramento Kings | 42.22% | 19 | 26 | 6 | 21 | Minnesota Timberwolves | 39.13% | 9 | 14 | 4 | 22 | Indiana Pacers | 38.89% | 14 | 22 | 5 | 23 | Cleveland Cavaliers | 38.10% | 16 | 26 | 5 | 24 | Golden State Warriors | 35.56% | 16 | 29 | 3 | 24 | Washington Wizards | 35.56% | 16 | 29 | 7 | 26 | New Jersey Nets | 33.33% | 12 | 24 | 5 | 27 | Toronto Raptors | 29.41% | 5 | 12 | 0 | 28 | Memphis Grizzlies | 23.53% | 4 | 13 | 2 | 29 | Los Angeles Clippers | 16.67% | 7 | 35 | 2 | 30 | Charlotte Bobcats | 12.50% | 1 | 7 | 0 | Look at how good Utah, Phoenix, and Portland have been with little to show for it. Toronto and Charlotte have yet to make the playoffs, while the Clippers only boast two appearances in 42 years. Ouch. At least Golden State has 3.
MOST CONSECUTIVE YEARS IN D1/D2
The longest lengths of time spent in division one (bold means a current streak):
| Years | First | Last | Utah Jazz | 21 | 1985 | 2005 | Portland Trailblazers | 18 | 1988 | 2005 | Los Angeles Lakers | 17 | 1996 | 2012 | Los Angeles Lakers | 16 | 1978 | 1993 | Boston Celtics | 14 | 1981 | 1994 | San Antonio Spurs | 14 | 1999 | 2012 | New York Knicks | 13 | 1990 | 2002 | Milwaukee Bucks | 12 | 1981 | 1992 | Philadelphia 76ers | 12 | 1977 | 1988 | Chicago Bulls | 11 | 1989 | 1999 | Dallas Mavericks | 11 | 2002 | 2012 | The Lakers can't quite match the 30 year streak of the NHL's Boston Bruins, but they are one of three west teams with a current double digit streak. They didn't get relegated despite missing the real life playoffs in 2004-05, as they were only the fourth worst team in the alternate reality D1 that year.
The longest lengths of time spent in division two:
| Years | First | Last | Los Angeles Clippers | 15 | 1978 | 1992 | Washington Wizards | 13 | 2000 | 2012 | Golden State Warriors | 12 | 1996 | 2007 | Los Angeles Clippers | 12 | 1995 | 2006 | Cleveland Cavaliers | 10 | 1980 | 1989 | Dallas Mavericks | 10 | 1992 | 2001 | New York Knicks | 10 | 2003 | 2012 | Utah Jazz | 10 | 1975 | 1984 | The alternate reality Wizards join the alternate reality Redskins in having their league's longest current streak in D2. Not a great time to be a Washington sports fan, huh?
2011 DIVISION ALIGNMENTS
Here's how two divisions would look for the current, just finished 2010-11 season, with the real life W-L records.
NBA-1
Chicago Bulls | 62 | 20 | San Antonio Spurs | 61 | 21 | Miami Heat | 58 | 24 | Los Angeles Lakers | 57 | 25 | Dallas Mavericks | 57 | 25 | Boston Celtics | 56 | 26 | Orlando Magic | 52 | 30 | Denver Nuggets | 50 | 32 |
|
|
| Portland Trailblazers | 48 | 34 | Atlanta Hawks | 44 | 38 | Phoenix Suns | 40 | 42 | Utah Jazz | 39 | 43 |
|
|
| Milwaukee Bucks | 35 | 47 | Charlotte Bobcats | 34 | 48 | Cleveland Cavaliers | 19 | 63 | So the eight playoff teams would correspond to the real life top eight seeds, with the exception of Denver instead of Oklahoma City.
The three relegated teams are Milwaukee, Charlotte, and Cleveland.
NBA-2
Oklahoma City Thunder | 55 | 27 | Memphis Grizzlies | 46 | 36 | New Orleans Hornets | 46 | 36 |
|
|
| Houston Rockets | 43 | 39 | New York Knicks | 42 | 40 | Philadelphia 76ers | 41 | 41 | Indiana Pacers | 37 | 45 | Golden State Warriors | 36 | 46 | Los Angeles Clippers | 32 | 50 | Detroit Pistons | 30 | 52 | Sacramento Kings | 24 | 58 | New Jersey Nets | 24 | 58 | Washington Wizards | 23 | 59 | Toronto Raptors | 22 | 60 | Minnesota Timberwolves | 17 | 65 | Three western conference teams are promoted in place of the relegated eastern three.
That gives us the following divisions for the 2011-12 season:
2012 DIVISION ALIGNMENTS
The number represents the current consecutive number of years in the division.
NBA-1
Atlanta Hawks | 3 | Boston Celtics | 4 | Chicago Bulls | 2 | Dallas Mavericks | 11 | Denver Nuggets | 8 | Los Angeles Lakers | 17 | Memphis Grizzlies | 1 | Miami Heat | 3 | New Orleans Hornets | 1 | Oklahoma City Thunder | 1 | Orlando Magic | 4 | Phoenix Suns | 7 | Portland Trailblazers | 3 | San Antonio Spurs | 14 | Utah Jazz | 6 | NBA-2
Charlotte Bobcats | 1 | Cleveland Cavaliers | 1 | Detroit Pistons | 2 | Golden State Warriors | 3 | Houston Rockets | 2 | Indiana Pacers | 5 | Los Angeles Clippers | 4 | Milwaukee Bucks | 1 | Minnesota Timberwolves | 6 | New Jersey Nets | 3 | New York Knicks | 10 | Philadelphia 76ers | 8 | Sacramento Kings | 5 | Toronto Raptors | 3 | Washington Wizards | 13 |
YEAR BY YEAR CHART
Orange = promoted Blue = relegated Green = playoffs
Labels: alternate history, nba, pro/rel |
Comments on "Alternate History 3: NBA & Pro/Rel"
Just found your blog and have to say I am very impressed with your stats and analysis. These deserve some praise for completeness.
Interesting read thanks for sharing