"Playoff Teams Only" Table

The records of each playoff team in 2010, only considering games against one another: GP W L D Pts GF GA GD 1 Los Angeles 14 9 4 1 28 22 13 9 2 Real Salt Lake 14 5 3 6 21 15 10 5 3 New York 14 5 6 3 18 14 17 -3 4 Colorado 14 4 5 5 17 16 18 -2 5 Seattle 14 4 5 5 17 15 17 -2 6 San Jose 14 4 5 5 17 11 13 -2 7 Columbus 14 4 5 5 17 15 19 -4 8 Dallas 14 2 4 8 14 16 17 -1 Makes LA look really good, no? Due to their recent lack of outstanding play, they seem to be getting less respect than RSL in playoff predictions. Bruce Arena really has done quite a good job with the Galaxy; they have the 7th best record over two seasons for 2009-2010. Meanwhile, all those draws don't keep FC Dallas out of the bottom spot. Only 2 wins in 14 tries against their playoff competition. SJ seems to have problems scoring against the top teams. They were shut out 8 times in these 14 games.

2010 Teams & Their All Time Ranks

Out of 180 MLS team seasons from 1996-2010 (shootouts counted as draws): Overall/Home/Away Tables (ranked by PPG, then GD per game, then GF per game) Overall Home Away LA 4 57 3 RSL 10 4 49 NY 29 23 50 DAL 32 43 36 CLB 34 22 60 SEA 46 84 31 COL 54 53 72 SJ 56 121 25 KC 110 113 92 CHI 135 160 71 TOR 142 119 141 HOU 154 147 128 NE 157 120 164 PHI 158 115 168 CHV 168 155 161 DC 175 178 129 For the actual records, I will soon update this page. The 2010 Los Angeles Galaxy rank as the 4th best team in league history, while 2010 Real Salt Lake also makes the top ten. However, that's not the only top ten pair of teams in the ranking: 2001 Miami and Chicago rank 2nd & 5th, and 1998 DC and LA are 1st & 6th. Each team's rank in their own history: LA 2nd out of 15 seasons RSL 1st out of 6 seasons NY 1st out of 15 seasons DAL 2nd out of 15 seasons CLB 3rd out of 15 seasons SEA 1st out of 2 seasons COL 3rd out of 15 seasons SJ 5th out of 13 seasons KC 10th out of 15 seasons CHI 12th out of 13 seasons TOR 2nd out of 4 seasons HOU 5th out of 5 seasons NE 12th out of 15 seasons PHI 1st out of 1 season CHV 5th out of 6 seasons DC 15th out of 15 seasons With the final game win against New England, New York ended up with their best season ever over 2000. A draw wouldn't have done it. Three other teams had their best ever seasons, though they're all recent expansion teams. DC United and Houston ended up with their worst ever teams by a good margin. GD/GF/GA per game GD GF GA LA 14 78 3 RSL 2 65 1 NY 42 131 8 DAL 25 96 6 CLB 53 114 27 SEA 61 125 36 COL 29 78 16 SJ 82 155 22 KC 82 144 36 CHI 102 138 52 TOR 132 161 67 HOU 138 114 132 NE 168 165 141 PHI 157 151 132 CHV 157 168 97 DC 175 180 122 DC had the worst offense in league history, while RSL had the best defense. I think the numbers need to be adjusted for each season, because the early years of MLS had a large amount of goals per game.

MLS Team Ages 2010

How old was each MLS team this year? I've got the answers below. I've also updated many of the all time age stats for each team and the league. This is a lot of data, so if you have any interesting observations or questions I would love to hear them. But first, a word of explanation on how this was figured out. I've given each player an age for the season, taken at the midway point (July 1st). So for example, Landon Donovan was 28.236 years old for 2010. Then, in order to take into account playing time, I multiplied by the number of minutes played. I then added the totals for each team, which were then divided by the entire team's number of minutes played. Here are the results for 2010: Age Table 1 Houston 28.47 12 2 Seattle 28.10 6 3 New York 28.08 3 4 Real Salt Lake 27.90 2 5 Dallas 27.78 4 6 San Jose 27.69 8 7 Kansas City 27.59 9 8 Colorado 27.54 7 9 Columbus 27.43 5 10 Chivas USA 27.15 15 11 Chicago 27.09 10 12 Los Angeles 27.05 1 13 Philadelphia 26.59 14 14 Toronto 26.52 11 15 New England 26.48 13 16 DC United 26.22 16 Houston was by far the oldest team in 2010. It's not unusual for them, however. They've been ranked 2-1-1-4-1 in their five years of existence. Most of the teams who did well this season were older, with the exception of LA. This isn't a trend which has been seen in years past, though. CLB was the second youngest team in both 2008-09, when they won the Supporters Shield twice. That's just one of many examples. When I checked after the 2008 season, there was only a 0.11 correlation between age and PPG (compared to 0.55 from a Basketball Prospectus article on the NBA's ages). It's interesting to see LA among the younger teams this year. Last year, they had the 4th oldest team in league history. Team Average Ages Chart 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 CHI xxx xxx 28.24 29.25 26.76 26.70 26.70 25.49 25.44 26.54 27.22 27.37 28.26 27.94 27.09 CHV xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 26.58 26.94 26.96 26.88 28.22 27.15 CLB 27.28 27.49 27.88 28.06 28.81 28.08 26.59 26.90 27.03 27.15 25.63 27.10 26.78 26.62 27.43 COL 28.39 27.51 27.57 28.55 27.45 28.51 29.56 27.73 27.29 26.86 27.49 27.60 27.12 27.45 27.54 DAL 28.39 27.59 28.45 28.32 28.41 28.25 27.54 26.21 26.86 26.65 27.18 25.43 26.28 27.20 27.78 DC 26.33 27.22 26.90 27.32 27.01 25.99 26.33 26.35 25.95 25.73 25.49 27.16 27.85 27.22 26.22 HOU xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 28.07 28.49 28.79 28.13 28.47 KC 27.57 28.50 28.90 28.29 28.30 27.65 28.55 28.55 27.21 27.91 27.16 27.07 27.66 28.58 27.59 LA 26.47 26.96 26.85 27.97 28.08 27.84 27.19 28.11 27.43 26.65 26.16 27.77 27.98 29.04 27.05 MIA xxx xxx 27.77 25.97 26.91 29.48 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx NE 26.70 27.72 27.84 28.73 27.31 27.18 27.06 27.14 26.65 26.28 27.04 27.40 27.14 26.49 26.48 NY 27.44 27.44 27.41 26.50 27.90 27.37 26.08 25.80 24.71 26.50 27.52 27.70 27.22 27.29 28.08 PHI xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 26.59 RSL xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 26.94 28.09 26.78 26.87 26.80 27.90 SEA xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 27.39 28.10 SJ 27.54 28.08 27.20 25.80 27.25 26.70 27.08 27.37 28.22 27.92 xxx xxx 28.19 28.10 27.69 TB 28.84 28.52 28.31 27.49 28.97 27.90 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx TOR xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 26.57 28.13 27.10 26.52 TOTAL 27.50 27.70 27.78 27.69 27.76 27.64 27.27 26.97 26.68 26.81 27.00 27.18 27.51 27.57 27.36 Team Yearly Age Ranks Chart (How teams ranked each year in terms of age. Ranked from oldest to youngest, so a one means they were the oldest team that season) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 CHI xxx xxx 4 1 12 11 7 10 9 9 5 6 2 6 11 CHV xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 8 9 10 12 3 10 CLB 7 7 5 6 2 4 8 6 5 3 11 8 13 14 9 COL 2 6 8 3 7 2 1 3 3 5 4 4 10 7 8 DAL 3 5 2 4 3 3 3 8 6 7 6 13 14 11 5 DC 10 9 11 9 10 12 9 7 8 12 12 7 6 10 16 HOU xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 2 1 1 4 1 KC 4 2 1 5 4 7 2 1 4 2 7 9 7 2 7 LA 9 10 12 7 5 6 4 2 2 6 10 2 5 1 12 MIA xxx xxx 7 11 11 1 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx NE 8 4 6 2 8 9 6 5 7 11 8 5 9 15 15 NY 6 8 9 10 6 8 10 9 10 10 3 3 8 9 3 PHI xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 13 RSL xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 4 1 11 11 13 4 SEA xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 8 2 SJ 5 3 10 12 9 10 5 4 1 1 xxx xxx 3 5 6 TB 1 1 3 8 1 5 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx TOR xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx 12 4 12 14 MLS Leaguewide Average Age The average age for all of MLS this season was 27.36, which was down from 27.57 in 2009. This comes after five straight years of increases. All time, the average age is 27.37 years. No team this season came close to making the list of youngest or oldest teams: Top Ten Youngest MLS Teams 1 2004 New York 24.71 2 2007 Dallas 25.43 3 2004 Chicago 25.44 4 2003 Chicago 25.49 5 2006 DC United 25.49 6 2006 Columbus 25.63 7 2005 DC United 25.72 8 2003 New York 25.80 9 1999 San Jose 25.80 10 2004 DC United 25.95 Top Ten Oldest MLS Teams 1 2002 Colorado 29.56 2 2001 Miami 29.48 3 1999 Chicago 29.25 4 2009 Los Angeles 29.04 5 2000 Tampa Bay 28.97 6 1998 Kansas City 28.90 7 1996 Tampa Bay 28.84 8 2000 Columbus 28.81 9 2008 Houston 28.79 10 1999 New England 28.73 MLS History: Percentage of Minutes Played by Age How about a breakdown for 2010's teams? 2010 Minutes by Age Group 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-42 CHI 0.00% 47.66% 29.57% 9.44% 13.33% 0.00% CHV 0.02% 44.93% 33.68% 14.59% 6.78% 0.00% CLB 0.00% 37.06% 44.31% 4.20% 14.43% 0.00% COL 0.00% 17.21% 68.38% 13.74% 0.67% 0.00% DAL 0.21% 34.02% 24.52% 32.14% 9.11% 0.00% DC 9.28% 27.88% 44.93% 12.49% 5.42% 0.00% HOU 0.00% 30.66% 37.94% 24.38% 0.00% 7.02% KC 0.00% 39.00% 29.49% 31.50% 0.00% 0.00% LA 2.96% 33.18% 40.77% 15.96% 7.12% 0.00% NE 0.00% 48.40% 26.19% 17.47% 7.94% 0.00% NY 0.05% 25.12% 46.16% 28.67% 0.00% 0.00% PHI 10.89% 28.72% 24.98% 33.26% 2.14% 0.00% RSL 0.00% 22.43% 49.39% 28.18% 0.00% 0.00% SEA 0.54% 34.25% 42.35% 5.98% 7.92% 8.95% SJ 0.26% 23.63% 51.15% 18.94% 6.02% 0.00% TOR 4.74% 30.10% 45.22% 19.95% 0.00% 0.00% Philadelphia had 10.89% of their minutes played by teens. This is the 4th highest percentage in league history. It's also notable that Dallas and Philly both had low percentages of minutes played by players in their 20's. They were at 58.84% and 53.70% respectively. Every other team in 2010 was at 68% or higher, and only 20/180 MLS seasons have been under 60%. All Time Minutes by Age Group 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-42 MLS 1996 0.24% 24.99% 52.17% 21.41% 1.20% 0.00% MLS 1997 0.07% 27.33% 46.77% 23.75% 2.08% 0.00% MLS 1998 0.05% 29.20% 41.84% 25.50% 3.40% 0.00% MLS 1999 0.18% 30.38% 38.07% 25.34% 6.03% 0.00% MLS 2000 0.79% 32.22% 36.30% 24.69% 6.00% 0.00% MLS 2001 3.03% 29.11% 34.89% 27.50% 5.46% 0.00% MLS 2002 2.40% 29.06% 43.12% 20.55% 3.99% 0.88% MLS 2003 2.53% 29.33% 45.12% 18.99% 3.16% 0.87% MLS 2004 3.76% 32.81% 43.32% 15.05% 5.03% 0.03% MLS 2005 3.03% 38.09% 35.42% 18.22% 5.11% 0.13% MLS 2006 2.39% 39.81% 31.44% 22.47% 3.89% 0.00% MLS 2007 1.55% 33.92% 34.32% 27.42% 2.79% 0.00% MLS 2008 1.24% 32.81% 33.32% 29.16% 2.96% 0.51% MLS 2009 0.50% 35.62% 32.66% 24.94% 5.65% 0.63% MLS 2010 1.80% 32.76% 39.95% 19.42% 5.06% 1.00% MLS Total 1.51% 32.13% 38.74% 23.15% 4.19% 0.28% 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-42 CHI 1998 0.00% 39.70% 16.83% 43.47% 0.00% 0.00% CHI 1999 0.00% 16.28% 40.47% 28.47% 14.78% 0.00% CHI 2000 3.36% 28.04% 50.71% 7.43% 10.46% 0.00% CHI 2001 7.89% 30.36% 46.89% 5.79% 9.07% 0.00% CHI 2002 0.33% 42.35% 44.75% 0.70% 11.88% 0.00% CHI 2003 4.92% 41.54% 46.13% 7.41% 0.00% 0.00% CHI 2004 6.99% 37.06% 44.12% 11.83% 0.00% 0.00% CHI 2005 0.51% 46.30% 18.39% 34.80% 0.00% 0.00% CHI 2006 0.00% 53.17% 14.70% 28.04% 4.10% 0.00% CHI 2007 0.00% 44.12% 24.62% 31.27% 0.00% 0.00% CHI 2008 0.00% 27.18% 34.75% 21.25% 16.82% 0.00% CHI 2009 0.00% 36.83% 32.80% 18.83% 11.55% 0.00% CHI 2010 0.00% 47.66% 29.57% 9.44% 13.33% 0.00% CHV 2005 0.02% 47.06% 32.37% 12.41% 8.15% 0.00% CHV 2006 0.07% 50.45% 13.41% 27.54% 8.53% 0.00% CHV 2007 0.05% 52.16% 17.75% 22.75% 7.28% 0.00% CHV 2008 2.00% 48.13% 24.41% 21.81% 3.65% 0.00% CHV 2009 1.12% 35.05% 25.49% 23.62% 14.35% 0.38% CHV 2010 0.02% 44.93% 33.68% 14.59% 6.78% 0.00% CLB 1996 0.00% 38.79% 31.67% 29.53% 0.00% 0.00% CLB 1997 0.00% 41.90% 28.92% 25.04% 4.14% 0.00% CLB 1998 0.00% 21.74% 48.77% 23.13% 6.36% 0.00% CLB 1999 0.00% 20.98% 47.85% 19.26% 11.91% 0.00% CLB 2000 0.00% 17.66% 48.20% 25.93% 8.20% 0.00% CLB 2001 0.00% 28.60% 39.97% 28.73% 2.70% 0.00% CLB 2002 0.00% 38.71% 43.82% 13.16% 4.32% 0.00% CLB 2003 0.00% 15.33% 60.99% 23.68% 0.00% 0.00% CLB 2004 9.51% 26.89% 41.36% 13.75% 8.50% 0.00% CLB 2005 3.53% 49.47% 12.92% 25.84% 8.24% 0.00% CLB 2006 10.78% 34.54% 39.86% 14.81% 0.00% 0.00% CLB 2007 0.00% 39.07% 36.42% 18.25% 6.26% 0.00% CLB 2008 0.00% 39.68% 36.93% 13.56% 9.83% 0.00% CLB 2009 0.00% 50.07% 30.94% 12.85% 6.15% 0.00% CLB 2010 0.00% 37.06% 44.31% 4.20% 14.43% 0.00% COL 1996 0.00% 25.69% 42.10% 25.67% 6.55% 0.00% COL 1997 0.00% 22.03% 59.31% 18.66% 0.00% 0.00% COL 1998 0.00% 25.05% 47.14% 27.81% 0.00% 0.00% COL 1999 0.00% 28.07% 22.71% 49.22% 0.00% 0.00% COL 2000 0.06% 44.95% 20.90% 34.08% 0.00% 0.00% COL 2001 0.74% 24.73% 30.96% 39.32% 4.25% 0.00% COL 2002 0.00% 25.67% 22.91% 33.89% 8.72% 8.81% COL 2003 0.00% 36.36% 23.81% 32.14% 7.69% 0.00% COL 2004 0.00% 40.44% 35.18% 24.39% 0.00% 0.00% COL 2005 0.40% 37.15% 49.68% 11.38% 1.38% 0.00% COL 2006 0.00% 33.01% 38.60% 28.39% 0.00% 0.00% COL 2007 0.00% 28.54% 30.51% 39.17% 1.78% 0.00% COL 2008 0.00% 30.25% 45.68% 20.12% 3.95% 0.00% COL 2009 0.00% 13.14% 71.84% 11.69% 3.34% 0.00% COL 2010 0.00% 17.21% 68.38% 13.74% 0.67% 0.00% DAL 1996 0.92% 15.30% 50.57% 27.80% 5.40% 0.00% DAL 1997 0.00% 26.27% 47.26% 26.25% 0.22% 0.00% DAL 1998 0.00% 17.03% 52.27% 26.20% 4.50% 0.00% DAL 1999 0.00% 19.48% 50.64% 28.19% 1.68% 0.00% DAL 2000 0.00% 30.97% 36.63% 32.34% 0.07% 0.00% DAL 2001 6.51% 12.74% 28.16% 48.83% 3.77% 0.00% DAL 2002 8.45% 17.16% 43.61% 30.78% 0.00% 0.00% DAL 2003 7.69% 39.81% 24.12% 28.37% 0.00% 0.00% DAL 2004 0.36% 34.81% 35.65% 25.47% 3.71% 0.00% DAL 2005 3.61% 34.50% 35.92% 23.92% 2.04% 0.00% DAL 2006 0.04% 36.42% 30.03% 32.37% 1.14% 0.00% DAL 2007 1.48% 45.21% 37.70% 13.78% 1.82% 0.00% DAL 2008 1.40% 51.37% 18.67% 28.57% 0.00% 0.00% DAL 2009 2.46% 41.85% 21.53% 34.16% 0.00% 0.00% DAL 2010 0.21% 34.02% 24.52% 32.14% 9.11% 0.00% DC 1996 0.00% 26.62% 68.53% 4.85% 0.00% 0.00% DC 1997 0.00% 20.62% 62.23% 17.15% 0.00% 0.00% DC 1998 0.00% 31.59% 48.04% 20.37% 0.00% 0.00% DC 1999 0.00% 26.81% 40.82% 32.37% 0.00% 0.00% DC 2000 5.61% 27.89% 29.33% 37.16% 0.00% 0.00% DC 2001 7.46% 47.01% 18.00% 25.11% 2.42% 0.00% DC 2002 13.93% 24.40% 37.11% 24.56% 0.00% 0.00% DC 2003 2.38% 33.00% 49.01% 12.69% 2.91% 0.00% DC 2004 5.24% 30.80% 46.55% 10.35% 7.06% 0.00% DC 2005 4.70% 40.49% 38.52% 15.38% 0.90% 0.00% DC 2006 7.98% 55.29% 20.70% 16.03% 0.00% 0.00% DC 2007 0.35% 30.25% 46.30% 23.10% 0.00% 0.00% DC 2008 0.00% 30.68% 44.43% 24.89% 0.00% 0.00% DC 2009 0.00% 39.32% 28.62% 27.88% 4.18% 0.00% DC 2010 9.28% 27.88% 44.93% 12.49% 5.42% 0.00% HOU 2006 0.00% 26.67% 45.73% 18.46% 9.15% 0.00% HOU 2007 0.00% 22.95% 45.67% 23.23% 8.15% 0.00% HOU 2008 0.00% 19.71% 25.39% 47.82% 0.00% 7.09% HOU 2009 0.36% 38.06% 29.74% 22.70% 0.00% 9.14% HOU 2010 0.00% 30.66% 37.94% 24.38% 0.00% 7.02% KC 1996 0.00% 23.47% 51.86% 24.67% 0.00% 0.00% KC 1997 0.40% 19.91% 52.95% 22.13% 4.60% 0.00% KC 1998 0.10% 15.47% 51.71% 19.29% 13.44% 0.00% KC 1999 0.00% 30.55% 31.53% 21.75% 16.16% 0.00% KC 2000 0.00% 34.21% 27.61% 24.23% 13.96% 0.00% KC 2001 0.34% 28.36% 42.28% 25.83% 3.19% 0.00% KC 2002 0.00% 17.28% 54.87% 16.23% 11.62% 0.00% KC 2003 0.00% 18.65% 53.78% 18.86% 0.00% 8.71% KC 2004 0.00% 33.57% 46.83% 12.92% 6.37% 0.30% KC 2005 0.00% 25.79% 50.23% 22.47% 0.00% 1.51% KC 2006 0.70% 24.69% 56.68% 17.93% 0.00% 0.00% KC 2007 2.25% 25.24% 47.42% 25.09% 0.00% 0.00% KC 2008 0.00% 35.83% 27.55% 36.62% 0.00% 0.00% KC 2009 0.00% 31.25% 28.87% 30.78% 9.11% 0.00% KC 2010 0.00% 39.00% 29.49% 31.50% 0.00% 0.00% LA 1996 0.00% 33.66% 66.34% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% LA 1997 0.00% 38.13% 45.66% 16.21% 0.00% 0.00% LA 1998 0.00% 41.96% 24.22% 33.82% 0.00% 0.00% LA 1999 0.53% 21.07% 40.57% 30.64% 7.19% 0.00% LA 2000 0.00% 21.20% 40.14% 31.91% 6.75% 0.00% LA 2001 0.00% 30.94% 37.05% 25.03% 6.99% 0.00% LA 2002 0.00% 41.56% 30.37% 28.07% 0.00% 0.00% LA 2003 0.42% 31.82% 37.69% 25.72% 4.35% 0.00% LA 2004 0.38% 32.26% 42.72% 14.85% 9.79% 0.00% LA 2005 0.00% 45.36% 31.61% 15.44% 7.59% 0.00% LA 2006 7.07% 48.79% 20.82% 17.92% 5.40% 0.00% LA 2007 4.10% 26.74% 33.24% 30.25% 5.68% 0.00% LA 2008 0.02% 32.58% 28.42% 36.09% 2.88% 0.00% LA 2009 0.00% 25.95% 28.94% 28.74% 16.37% 0.00% LA 2010 2.96% 33.18% 40.77% 15.96% 7.12% 0.00% MIA 1998 0.00% 38.41% 30.99% 25.69% 4.92% 0.00% MIA 1999 0.00% 54.93% 22.86% 17.10% 5.11% 0.00% MIA 2000 0.34% 37.61% 34.61% 23.74% 3.70% 0.00% MIA 2001 0.05% 28.11% 18.63% 36.95% 16.25% 0.00% NE 1996 0.00% 32.80% 52.42% 14.78% 0.00% 0.00% NE 1997 0.00% 25.22% 50.60% 17.93% 6.25% 0.00% NE 1998 0.16% 20.34% 57.18% 22.33% 0.00% 0.00% NE 1999 1.59% 17.88% 42.41% 30.26% 7.85% 0.00% NE 2000 0.10% 35.26% 35.98% 28.66% 0.00% 0.00% NE 2001 0.00% 41.01% 34.22% 18.01% 6.77% 0.00% NE 2002 0.00% 29.87% 47.06% 23.06% 0.00% 0.00% NE 2003 0.00% 24.13% 57.30% 18.57% 0.00% 0.00% NE 2004 0.00% 40.65% 43.21% 16.14% 0.00% 0.00% NE 2005 0.00% 42.52% 39.02% 18.46% 0.00% 0.00% NE 2006 0.00% 40.53% 34.27% 25.20% 0.00% 0.00% NE 2007 0.07% 32.54% 36.62% 30.77% 0.00% 0.00% NE 2008 8.97% 31.30% 28.20% 31.53% 0.00% 0.00% NE 2009 0.13% 42.85% 27.05% 24.75% 5.22% 0.00% NE 2010 0.00% 48.40% 26.19% 17.47% 7.94% 0.00% NY 1996 0.00% 18.14% 63.59% 18.27% 0.00% 0.00% NY 1997 0.00% 29.55% 46.18% 24.27% 0.00% 0.00% NY 1998 0.29% 23.01% 66.05% 10.65% 0.00% 0.00% NY 1999 0.00% 38.73% 39.98% 21.29% 0.00% 0.00% NY 2000 0.00% 51.68% 13.37% 26.69% 8.26% 0.00% NY 2001 0.00% 33.30% 31.55% 35.15% 0.00% 0.00% NY 2002 0.00% 36.59% 50.57% 9.51% 3.34% 0.00% NY 2003 7.78% 30.08% 51.78% 10.36% 0.00% 0.00% NY 2004 13.86% 34.79% 41.91% 9.43% 0.00% 0.00% NY 2005 20.77% 29.21% 23.05% 9.59% 17.37% 0.00% NY 2006 1.11% 38.58% 31.18% 10.74% 18.38% 0.00% NY 2007 4.73% 21.65% 33.84% 34.51% 5.27% 0.00% NY 2008 2.24% 33.40% 32.98% 31.38% 0.00% 0.00% NY 2009 0.00% 32.63% 40.48% 26.89% 0.00% 0.00% NY 2010 0.05% 25.12% 46.16% 28.67% 0.00% 0.00% PHI 2010 10.89% 28.72% 24.98% 33.26% 2.14% 0.00% RSL 2005 2.81% 32.59% 44.85% 19.75% 0.00% 0.00% RSL 2006 0.92% 35.52% 31.40% 32.16% 0.00% 0.00% RSL 2007 5.70% 35.68% 27.74% 30.88% 0.00% 0.00% RSL 2008 0.00% 19.42% 66.53% 14.05% 0.00% 0.00% RSL 2009 0.00% 34.15% 48.30% 17.55% 0.00% 0.00% RSL 2010 0.00% 22.43% 49.39% 28.18% 0.00% 0.00% SEA 2009 0.00% 37.31% 37.94% 16.10% 8.65% 0.00% SEA 2010 0.54% 34.25% 42.35% 5.98% 7.92% 8.95% SJ 1996 1.46% 12.08% 62.74% 23.72% 0.00% 0.00% SJ 1997 0.00% 19.47% 43.36% 37.17% 0.00% 0.00% SJ 1998 0.00% 47.72% 21.39% 25.79% 5.09% 0.00% SJ 1999 0.00% 55.87% 32.22% 11.90% 0.00% 0.00% SJ 2000 0.00% 36.24% 47.45% 16.31% 0.00% 0.00% SJ 2001 6.33% 23.50% 46.19% 23.99% 0.00% 0.00% SJ 2002 1.15% 17.23% 56.17% 25.45% 0.00% 0.00% SJ 2003 2.14% 22.91% 45.88% 12.38% 16.68% 0.00% SJ 2004 1.26% 16.78% 55.68% 11.43% 14.86% 0.00% SJ 2005 0.00% 26.63% 48.64% 9.07% 15.66% 0.00% SJ 2008 0.00% 29.54% 35.49% 30.98% 3.99% 0.00% SJ 2009 0.00% 29.97% 30.33% 33.90% 5.80% 0.00% SJ 2010 0.26% 23.63% 51.15% 18.94% 6.02% 0.00% TB 1996 0.00% 23.37% 31.89% 44.74% 0.00% 0.00% TB 1997 0.34% 30.26% 31.12% 32.74% 5.53% 0.00% TB 1998 0.00% 28.42% 37.65% 27.43% 6.51% 0.00% TB 1999 0.00% 34.06% 44.78% 13.52% 7.63% 0.00% TB 2000 0.00% 20.99% 50.50% 7.79% 20.72% 0.00% TB 2001 6.93% 20.79% 43.78% 18.60% 9.90% 0.00% TOR 2007 1.43% 36.85% 28.18% 33.53% 0.00% 0.00% TOR 2008 2.85% 30.34% 16.87% 49.63% 0.30% 0.00% TOR 2009 3.39% 45.95% 7.02% 43.63% 0.00% 0.00% TOR 2010 4.74% 30.10% 45.22% 19.95% 0.00% 0.00%